Well, well, well, I hadn’t expected to write about TV Licensing again so quickly after my TV Licensing are back with a vengeance post from just three weeks ago. But it seems they have started a new tactic at least I haven’t seen before. Two days ago I found this letter in my mail:
From the “The Legal Occupier” I could tell it was from TV Licensing. But what was new was the window on the envelope, revealing a “10-Day Window”, but not more. So I was intrigued. What was the 10 day window for? Was it going to be the window the threatened TV Licensing Inspector would finally visit me?
Turns out, no. They are giving me a 10-day window to get correctly licensed. Which I already am. This is what they say:
They claim they put my “case” on hold for 10 days, during which I won’t have to expect a visit by the dreaded TV Licensing Inspector. How nice. That makes me sleep better (no, sadly not). And without a TV Licence I may be breaking the law. Except I’m not. I don’t do anything from their list as I’ve got better things to do, like writing this blog post.
Apparently I ONLY have until the 4th of September to act. Well, I’m acting now and I’m doing …. nothing.
Let’s see what happens after the 4th of September.
Very long term readers of this blog might remember the fun I had with TV Licensing in the early to mid 2000s. On the previous now archived iteration of this blog there’s a whole collection of The TV Licensing Saga. Towards the end of it the problem kind of got resolved and they left me in peace for a while. When I moved into my current flat I registered my new address as not needing a TV Licence and all was good for a while. Not any more…..
TV Licensing is back with a vengeance. And they haven’t changed one bit, if anything they’ve gotten worse.
But let’s take a step back: When I registered my current address as not needing a TV Licence I did so online, which also required me to give them my email. From then on every once I while I received an unfriendly email suggesting I was lying to them, but at least it had a link to the page where I could tell them I still don’t need one. So far, so moderately good.
Early this year that changed.
Instead of the unfriendly email I received a letter claiming something had changed at my address/household (no, it hadn’t. Nothing had changed). Initially I thought that was just a mistake and the usual accusatory email would arrive soon. Not so. Soon another letter arrived. And another. And another. And another. And another. And another. And another.
And today this one arrived:
OFFICIAL NOTICE
Really? I’m pretty sure there’s nothing “official” about you, you’re a private company working on behalf of the BBC.
You are breaching the Communications Act 2003 if you do not have a TV Licence to cover you for: – Watching or recording live TV on any channel or device – Everything on BBC iPlayer at [address]
Thing is, that only applies if you’re doing any of the two things they list. Which I don’t. So it doesn’t apply.
The rest of the letter continues in a similar tone. It does give a link to declare that no TV Licence is needed, but with the barrage and tone of their letters quite frankly I can’t be bothered. I’m just going to let them continue wasting their money on sending those letters. Their problem, not mine.
More importantly though, I think these letters are bad. They are deliberately designed and written to scare people into getting a TV Licence even if they don’t need one. Prime example the paragraph quoted above. Mentioning a law, implying that the recipient is breaking the law with confusing and threatening language, even if the recipient doesn’t need a TV Licence. I wouldn’t be surprised if quite a few people who don’t need one get one because they don’t understand the letters and get scared. That can’t be right.
Anyway, let’s see how this continues, if the threatened inspector ever turns up (past experience says no). I will continue shredding their letters (if I get another interesting one I might share it) and not watching live TV and/or iPlayer.
PS: Just to be clear, I’m not against the TV Licence per se. If I was watching live TV and/or using iPlayer I would happily pay it. But I don’t, so I don’t need to. What I object to are the practices of the TV Licencing contractors, Capita or whoever that is these days.
I promised I’d write a blog post about them, so I better get it done before 2023 comes to an end. Some time during the summer I came across Coach Party from the Isle of Wight, probably on BBC Radio 6 Music. I’m not sure which song I heard first, good chance it was the one I’ve already mentioned:
Some more delicious noise in the next one:
I don’t know what period drama/series (if any) they are referencing in the video, but I think It’s quite enjoyable. And there’s more nice noise
I’m not sure why hate is featuring in their songs at an alarming rate, as here’s a second song with hate in the title, although the roles are reversed this time:
To close a song that hopefully isn’t going to weird you out
That’s it for Coach Party for now. If you didn’t know them before I hope you might have found something you like as well.
I’ve mentioned Wet Leg on this blog a while ago, now it’s time for another band from the Isle of Wight, which probably will extend to a Bands New To Me post later this year. The band is Coach Party, the song is (obviously) What’s The Point In Life:
Just under three minutes of pleasant noise with catchy lyrics, what’s not to love?
Do I feel old now? Yes and no. After all age is just a number. Still, earlier today I spotted that one of the defining albums of my youth is 40 years old today. Yes, Big Country’s The Crossing was released 40 years ago. So let’s look back to some of my favourite songs from it, as far as I’m concerned still sounding fresh today. One of the first singles:
And the same again, but live:
Of course there’s In A Big Country, the opener:
Moving on to Chance:
And my last pick for this post, Porrohman:
Oh, and to get back to the intro of this post: Many people apparently stop discovering new music after a certain age and only listen to the music from their youth. I do both, I still listen to some bands from my youth (hence this post) while also discovering new bands with members sometimes barely half the age of the older albums I still listen to. That’s how I firmly believe it should be: Treasure the great classics while being open to new discoveries.